From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: Please supply stable releases on ELPA or MELPA Stable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-dist @ /usr/local/share/emacs/25.1.50/site-lisp/org-mode/)] Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:08:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2cne9ud.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87mvhltqpw.fsf@sc3d.org> <87oa21tmp0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ins8ftyv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pomfv6kf.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Wvb-0001hP-Ms for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 07:08:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Wva-0003YS-IE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 07:08:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pomfv6kf.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Tue, 01 Nov 2016 11:27:12 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Josiah Schwab , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , Reuben Thomas Hello, Bastien Guerry writes: > We could simply have daily snapshot of the maint branch in addition to > daily snapshot of the master branch. > > For now http://orgmode.org/org-latest.tar.gz is build from the master > branch, but we could also have http://orgmode.org/org-bugfix.tar.gz. > > What do you think? This is not what I'm suggesting. Let me try to expunge a bit. I thing we should automate bugfix releases with regular version numbering scheme, e.g., 8.3.7 release, /as a replacement for/ org-YYYYMMDD releases. Therefore: 1. org-YYYYMMDD could be renamed org-MAJOR-MINOR-BUGFIX# where MAJOR MINOR are never modified automatically, and BUGFIX# is (1+ last BUGFIX#). 2. Conditions to make a new automated release ought to change. We could wait for a full "idle" week after a commit before releasing (IOW, wait for one week after a commit but every new commit during that period resets the counter). "next Monday" rule has bitten us already. The new rule is not perfect either, but is more secure. If one full week is too long, we may reduce it to 4 days. OTOH "org-bugfix.tar.gz" is not monotonic, so it buys us very little. What do you think? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou