From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [Patch] Support for dimming local to each agenda Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:29:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87k23be81f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <8760ewfqja.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVvyF-0007SD-KN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:29:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVvyC-0005TB-HN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:29:07 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:38057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVvyC-0005SS-AY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:29:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Yuri Lensky's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:09:39 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Yuri Lensky Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, Yuri Lensky writes: > Thanks. I have attached an updated patch that addresses your points (with > some additional cleanup). Thank you. >> Why is `save-mark-and-excursion' needed? >> > Because we are moving point to get to the heading, and in principle hooks > in org-blocker-hook can change point/mark. Since we don't care about mark, isn't `save-excursion' sufficient? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou