From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nathan Aclander <nathan.aclander@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: shiftmeta[left|right] on multi line items [9.1.2
 (release_9.1.2-40-g6ca906 @ /usr/local/share/emacs/27.0.50/lisp/org/)]
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:41:25 -0800
Message-ID: <87k1xvwh1m.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87a7zezz4e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2seuzm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51631)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nathan.aclander@gmail.com>) id 1eNpgV-0007KB-UJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:41:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nathan.aclander@gmail.com>) id 1eNpgS-000470-Pl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:41:35 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]:35973)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <nathan.aclander@gmail.com>)
	id 1eNpgS-00046Z-IF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:41:32 -0500
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k134so8811814pga.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:41:32 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <87r2seuzm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Nathan Aclander <nathan.aclander@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> I don't qualify this as a bug. These commands explicitly work when point
> is at the beginning of an item. Indeed, the sub-item may be arbitrarily
> large, contain tables... it would be confusing to move the whole
> sub-list when its structure is out of sight.

Why do you think it would be confusing to move the whole sub-list? Why
would it be move confusing when the point is on the sub-item vs. when
the point is on the parent item?

I think the inconsistency is unintuitive here, and causes confusion. And
I think since large sub-items already get moved when the point is
at the beginning, it would make sense to also move them when the point
is on the sub item.

Nathan

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=V5VG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--