From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: New exporter and defgroup
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:26:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87ip3hzmqz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87ppxqbs2p.fsf@sbs.ch>
	<20130419174341.GC3154@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35814)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UTSBc-0005o7-PQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:26:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UTSBb-0005bX-Ue
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:26:16 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:49534)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UTSBb-0005ac-Nn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:26:15 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id c10so1842109wiw.14
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130419174341.GC3154@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> (Suvayu Ali's
	message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:43:41 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

yes, this *is* a problem.

Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> Can we have some sort of a check while loading Org that picks up these
> shadowed variables and "deletes" them?

I think Achim has been thinking about some incantation for this
(at install time).  Maybe if this can be done after installation,
we could document it somewhere... not really sure.

I didn't want to change defgroup, it would have been confusing 
to have to groups for the same purpose -- with no real clue on
which one was the most recent one.

-- 
 Bastien