From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id oNG7E99ZZGcBQQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:37:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id oNG7E99ZZGcBQQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:37:35 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=AC1PhynP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1734629855; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ICIqKVw4RcRaSft+k+uh53W4X8Sa6iC1MIjVEWbzGbI=; b=o9cr3xq6W9dtQ95+PTW76rpDTpLhx0eLVvhd04TeAf9PSJRDSbyVNkSXgQw1fRLd/fooLn XkBpQy7KeFb0eHlTVpNLZxlP/78W1Ae0ucaeYpR8uv1EB6Wdkuh1p+CLRchm8WnLuK+OPP x+yWYTPzmPcmusZKghCSh8gObmsySeQZagGtJu+SjZ/MsbRG7dzq9uXVeB4J+LlB9KlFNg 3MwgPmhYutp+GgGuaz4ZcHbNaHX8MpuiEi4qrZWxW9Ab/ffykJNJDHy8+9nP9ICNkek6J7 52UR4UJwjebmz5JC26hNMmV+lkFPFCCvT2Vx74452Vl14G5jHyL3ozNB8cU9QQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1734629855; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MHjNojzwccDcwUkoQpnh9wTc4gEO8uJ2xa/aXkdaJk2wEf37s+Ug8QX6OdMFH642OPhqkf fPgbLwAFH16bARUY1JNEQ4YfDd2N31SIVL5fzh9tBe+8K8dwPs5ErvQC+4MZKeBOQ0K0I7 3Cp3QI2IsSDfAQEqsC7/EHStUbeCPr9OQZRs2ArRSNkJJg52vjPZboSdxM0LKwdAWxJSrY tc4ON4w5onFalYt6WlUTUbxW4diLDDxh7XW2Ge5nVOgLdvs6dl132mR+kISo4xRlcq+Rfu pS8DpCYyaBvdB6NCOQijigUxHahAtOdmuT562ZGa16rPZ1QbyQzW1LbR061s/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=AC1PhynP; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1949CA2C32 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:37:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOKS4-0006Ka-J8; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:36:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOKS1-0006Id-IP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:36:41 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tOKRz-0001TA-0V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:36:41 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6C3240027 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:36:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1734629795; bh=MRumrQ+sghOYXaTGgtL+97+Ms4nAw9kr8rMJUJx5m+U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=AC1PhynPZZA5AdPiRthlgEg1dPWOig+X6vPEUSRcwF0fVF0lKJiID1PA1/tp0dLZ1 KQrKocLBMZfkRbu/5Mcq+zmmhNm4EvOn8bHP6V+khWNfh9lGvo+kiDNtpx/Ua9ElTt pXTPJEG4N2+spmMYfn7lR86lIFJErE+5RfXrfCgWjufjdrbiBGMO4hJcVzI4mJCtgO zIdUV8Y9i98GP29NNNw8SnR6/BY4EAramI5Erd560oNwd4JOfC6rut0RYuT5vQYfcQ dIoI2rxkk8VdyXEFmHgPVpuFbi4t4OZodfRlToNcO57boVeLi+Ksxc/9Jx2iE/W2iD MweZty6rg0USw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YDd5G4S3Qz6twG; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:36:34 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Michael Heerdegen Cc: Nathan Collins , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: How to handle both minor mode and major mode remapping a command? In-Reply-To: <8734imtdtf.fsf@web.de> References: <87r0691asn.fsf@localhost> <8734imtdtf.fsf@web.de> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:38:05 +0000 Message-ID: <87ikrf7ev6.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.69 X-Spam-Score: -6.69 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1949CA2C32 X-TUID: jlbZPqF0WquN Michael Heerdegen writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> I am wondering if there is some canonical way to handle similar scenarios >> recommended for major modes. >> >> Any suggestions? > > Why not, as in similar situations, define a `kill-line-function' > variable with default value `kill-line-default-function' which is a > function (more or less our current `kill-line'). > > Any mode that wants to modify the behavior would `add-function' on that > variable binding. We would have one single place where the thing is > controlled, while the behavior can still be modified by future modes. That will, of course, work. However, I feel that it will only solve this exact problem, but nothing more. Just in Org mode, we also need special handling of `move-beginning-of-line' and `move-end-of-line' for visual mode (for the same reasons). Does it mean that we need to introduce yet more "*-function" variables? It will not be scalable. What I was thinking about is some way for command remapping to: 1. remap overriding minor modes 2. be able to access commands (possible remapped) that are shadowed by current remapping Maybe what I want is advice flexibility for keymaps. (not sure) -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at