From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Move to item to the bottom
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:57:04 +0200
Message-ID: <87hb765qfz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <BANLkTiksd8HAU5bu-=FqchGbSfsP7ULv5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<878vsjb14b.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkkya4ok.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43506)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QcZWh-0007sD-66
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:56:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QcZWf-0000sU-5S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:56:38 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:44624)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QcZWe-0000s0-IE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:56:36 -0400
Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so2767400fxd.39
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zkkya4ok.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 01
	Jul 2011 08:35:55 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at
> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to
> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its
> list.

Nice.  Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the
first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now.

What do you think?

-- 
 Bastien