From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: URGENT Bug with exporting org source block
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 12:28:04 -0400
Message-ID: <87hax3l8mj.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <CADNXMz9asuFUZaeXAciHUvt0RoqS2Y2pVbrZaALxaS7PHArORQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k420u9qo.fsf@gmx.com> <87vcljq5rt.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87bonbwrjn.fsf@gmx.com> <87mx6vpj5l.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41951)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SEPVk-0001VI-5R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:28:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SEPVi-0004rA-4J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:28:19 -0400
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:34615)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1SEPVh-0004qp-TK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:28:18 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> Eric Schulte writes:
>>> With your latest changes I get this test regression (I have not checked
>>> which commit is responsible):
>>>
>>
>> This is odd.  The first time I ran the test suite this test failed for
>> me as well, however on all subsequent runs of the test suite this test
>> passed, and manually looking through the test the code indeed does seem
>> to be acting as it should.
>
> This, together with the fact that I'll always start the test from a
> fresh 'emacs -Q' would hint at some variable that needs declaration or
> some other newly introduced dependency.  Do you have an idea what to
> look for?
>

I've just pushed up a fix for this.  After looking into the code I'm now
not sure why it was working at all... but I suppose all that matters is
that it is working now.

Thanks for the report,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/