From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [BUG] Traceback on Org-Export Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 19:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87hasi8rod.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54085.1343912461@gregair> <87haskz8ur.fsf@altern.org> <87628yrekx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxicR-00058r-2W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 13:58:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxicQ-0004GM-0i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 13:58:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:33106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxicP-0004GF-Q2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 13:58:29 -0400 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so368642wib.12 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 10:58:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87628yrekx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sat, 04 Aug 2012 15:06:54 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > This seems to be further fallout from moving the require forms in org.el > past the constant and variable definitions (which does make a difference > for Emacs23 vs Emacs24 since the scope rules are now different). > Bastien, what was the problem you were trying to solve there? I was trying to get rid of the many compiler warnings that you get from requiring libraries that relies on such variables and constants. > In any case, the interaction between org and org-element needs a > serious overhaul and while we're at it this work should be extended to > other subsystems of org. Yes. The whole maze needs a treat. Please submit a patch if you feel like undertaking this task. I managed to get zero warnings with Emacs 24.1 and did not take the time to check with Emacs 23. Thanks, -- Bastien