From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Compilation problem
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:23:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87har5r5iv.fsf@altern.org>
References: <m2pq5u2h8h.fsf@top.irisa.fr>
	<5986.1347306768@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
	<87wr01hc4f.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87lighr5xf.fsf@altern.org>
	<87pq5thbno.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59279)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TBAWE-0003Sl-8z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:23:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TBAW8-00077G-Q6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:23:42 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:40050)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TBAW8-00076a-DJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:23:36 -0400
Received: by wgbdt14 with SMTP id dt14so1721481wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87pq5thbno.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon,
	10 Sep 2012 22:21:15 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> Bastien writes:
>> Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:
>>> That would be commit 830a0781a6 by Jambunathan, then.  Autoloads really
>>> don't work that way, so could this please be reverted?
>>
>> Done.
>
> Thank you.
>
> By way of explanation: autoload knows about a handful of "special"
> constructs.  If you put an autoload cookie on any other sexp, it will be
> copied verbatim into the autoload file.  This comes in handy sometimes,
> but the sexp may not make any sense in that context…

Yes.  On top of that, I think these functions do not need to be
autoloaded anyway.  

-- 
 Bastien