From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: org-exp-bibtex missing in git? Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:02:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87hak8vv6r.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130303070635.GA12112@panahar> <87fw0cg42y.fsf@allisson.co> <87vc98be83.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfwwgdd.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzg2r05.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87ppzgusem.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppzcfy2e.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87lia0s7wi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <876213lqfk.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqtjo6h6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87boavcpzc.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw075ivl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqthk7vj.fsf@gmail.com> <8762103oso.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHogu-00021M-N5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:02:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHogp-0005Bm-NB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:02:28 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c02::233]:47059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHogp-0005Bi-Iw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 01:02:23 -0400 Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fq11so59711vbb.10 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:02:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8762103oso.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:28:23 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Andreas Leha , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, 2013ko martxoak 9an, Bastien-ek idatzi zuen: > > This is great -- I'll be offline this week-end, so I won't have time > to have a careful look before monday. But I will. I hope this is not bothersome, but have you had a chance to look at these patches? I thought they would solve the problem in the thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68649 involving HTML image width specifications, but I was mistaken. Nonetheless, I think they are useful for a sort of bare-bones LaTeX bibliographies, as well as solving the problem of not being able to specify different ATTR_HTML lines for 2 links in the same paragraph. Thanks, -- Aaron Ecay