From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:37:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9x4bj33.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fvcozfhf.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:32 +0100")
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> Clearly the current situation is not satisfactory ("You can use :lines,
> but only if no footnotes are present. . . IOW, :lines supports a subset
> of Org syntax.").
>
> I prefer converting [fn:N] references to [fn::FOOTNOTE] (see my other
> email). Any obvious downsides?
Yes: inline and regular footnotes are not equivalent. For example,
a regular footnote can contain a table, a plain list... So this is not
an option here.
I think required definitions should be extracted from the included file
and inserted at the end of the source file, without any footnote
section. However, it would be nice to store associations between files
and footnote labels in, e.g., a hash table, in order to avoid inserting
multiple times the same footnote.
Regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 11:44 [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:10 ` Rasmus
2014-12-09 19:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-09 21:21 ` Rasmus
2014-12-09 21:37 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2014-12-10 0:57 ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 11:21 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-10 11:58 ` Rasmus
2014-12-10 15:44 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-13 21:45 ` Rasmus
2014-12-17 23:30 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-18 17:37 ` Rasmus
2014-12-19 16:44 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 21:04 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-21 22:39 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 23:38 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 1:42 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 9:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-24 18:03 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-25 1:38 ` Rasmus
2014-12-25 2:04 ` Rasmus
2014-12-21 20:52 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 1:49 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 11:10 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 12:36 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 20:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-22 22:11 ` Rasmus
2014-12-22 22:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-12-23 2:09 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 17:54 ` Rasmus
2014-12-24 18:10 ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? (was: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes) Rasmus
2014-12-24 21:09 ` [git-101] How to push a branch and avoid merge-message? Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9x4bj33.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).