From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 16:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9mmfoyw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87zj0fd07u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a8sehqdk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871tdqog25.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZePqW-0001J1-Qm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:51:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZePqT-0006FP-Ik for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:51:08 -0400 Received: from mail-db3on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.113]:27264 helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZePqT-00064R-A9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:51:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871tdqog25.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:21:22 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tuesday, 22 Sep 2015 at 13:21, Rasmus wrote: > Key word being 'arguably'. indeed! > Some people might hate the margin choices to the extend that they'd > need geometry to make KOMA-script bearable. Now we have two new > dependencies... yes. The real question is not the dependencies but what would we like new users to when they try exporting a document to PDF for the first time? Is the LaTeX default article good enough or would using koma impress them more? I don't know the answer to this... For not so novice users, customising org-latex-classes is relatively painless. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3.1-239-gd01560