From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-agenda-scheduled-leaders and repeating tasks Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9ldcq4c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87eggueq64.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1w82tim.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87mvv6ex91.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87611udfom.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqoft-0003NN-Ca for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:47:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqofs-0001FC-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:47:25 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqofs-0001F8-1I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:47:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: (cesar mena's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:31:44 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: cesar mena Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org cesar mena writes: > > yes i suspect this is why it hasn't been reported in years. > > what say you nicolas? Please do not top-post :) In any case, I'm not sure Samuel complains about the current behaviour. Actually, I don't understand what is meant by "the old behaviour" in this context. The behaviour changed a couple of times already in this thread. > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Samuel Wales wrote: >> fwiw, i am one who is so [disorganized?] that the old behavior is >> preferred. if something is a 6m repeater, and i ignore it for 6m, >> it's actually useful to be reminded after another repeat. perhaps >> more normal people would understand 1w. no matter how much i "should" >> mootify it or take it off the list or do it, this "bug" has proved >> useful in practice. >> >> i don't claim to represent hordes of disorganized people, but there you have it. Regards,