From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Feature proposal: Triple square brackets to create a link to a file AND include the file Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:54:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8ibhtxe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <1538048127.1873.26.camel@gmail.com> <87o9cjjgn7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1538050703.1873.31.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Xgz-0000fD-Lw for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:55:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Xgw-0002Zo-FL for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:55:01 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:50021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Xgw-0002Yr-99 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:54:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1538050703.1873.31.camel@gmail.com> (ST's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:18:23 +0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: ST Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, ST writes: > What do you mean by "inlined"? Roughly, I mean "located within a paragraph". > During an export such a link > [[[dir/file]]] should be replaced with the content of the "file", and > the link itself disappear. But in the source .org file it is just > shorter/cleaner way to write > > #+INCLUDE: "dir/file" This is different. It is easier to insert text at column 0 than at a random position in a line. You cannot do the latter in Org. > and be able to click the link to open the file in a separate buffer. This is already possible. > Why shouldn't it be possible to achieve just the same by ALSO clicking > on the URI? If you use .org files as a wiki - this feature is quite > useful. Why do you need something else if there is already a way to do what you want? I'm not a big fan of extending syntax gratuitously. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738