From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, matt@excalamus.com, jeremiejuste@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Async sessions: Fix prompt removal regression in ob-R
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 07:58:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h698wml2.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmi9etku.fsf@gmail.com>
Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Therefore, I've attached an updated patch that provides such a mechanism
> for ob-R and ob-python, reverting them to the Org 9.6 behavior. This is
> done through a variable `org-babel-comint-async-remove-prompts-p', which
> is set by an optional argument in `org-babel-comint-async-register'.
Looks reasonable in general.
> More generally, I think it is best to avoid doing the prompt removal
> when possible, since it is difficult (impossible?) to do it perfectly,
> and it can cause many problems. This is why ob-python avoids using
> `org-babel-comint-with-output' -- it sources a tmp file rather than
> inputting code directly to comint, so that prompts do not leak. I think
> non-async R evaluation would benefit from a similar approach, and plan
> to propose a patch to make ob-R non-async eval more similar to
> ob-python.
Agree. The prompt removal code is there simply because comint has no
reliable facilities to distinguish between prompts, input, and output.
If we can avoid it, we should.
I recall the annoying issues with ob-ruby, where the REPL spits prompts
asynchronously, making prompt filtering very hard (impossible?).
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/875y4vv8ie.fsf@localhost/
I have one small nipick comment on the patch:
> (org-babel-comint-async-register
> session (current-buffer)
> "ob_comint_async_python_\\(start\\|end\\|file\\)_\\(.+\\)"
> - 'org-babel-chomp 'org-babel-python-async-value-callback)
> + 'org-babel-chomp 'org-babel-python-async-value-callback
> + t)
Rather than `t', I'd use something more descriptive like 'disable-prompt-filtering.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-19 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-22 21:45 [PATCH] Async sessions: Fix prompt removal regression in ob-R Jack Kamm
2024-10-02 17:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-10-15 7:03 ` Jack Kamm
2024-10-19 7:58 ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2024-10-20 7:01 ` Jack Kamm
2024-10-20 9:34 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-10-22 3:32 ` Jack Kamm
2024-10-22 17:16 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-10-28 2:55 ` Jack Kamm
2024-10-28 17:16 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-11-02 0:19 ` Jack Kamm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h698wml2.fsf@localhost \
--to=yantar92@posteo.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=jackkamm@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremiejuste@gmail.com \
--cc=matt@excalamus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).