From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Capitalisation and good taste ? Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:38:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87fwfmntan.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k4509rc1.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87aa5wcitv.fsf@norang.ca> <23144.1326172391@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <8762gk9l27.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87wr8zwdz1.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqergxf6.fsf@gmx.com> <87ehv7wcx5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Es-00076e-Df for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:37:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Em-00042r-MI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:37:22 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:55679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl0Em-00042k-Ge for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:37:16 -0500 Received: by werf1 with SMTP id f1so843249wer.0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:37:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ehv7wcx5.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:55:02 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Bernt Hansen , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Actually, I'm thinking of another solution: > > - keep one-line option/environment keywords uppercase > #+NAME > #+HTML > #+TITLE > #+... > > - use lowercase for multi-lines environments keywords > #+begin_ascii > #+begin_html > #+results > > This is the only good criterium I can think of, and that > way people using easy templates will not be surprised to > see #+begin_xxx in the manual. I tried this and I find the lowercase #+begin_xxx really not readable enough in the manual. So I use #+RESULTS: and explained this convention in the manual. -- Bastien