From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [bug, patch, ox] INCLUDE and footnotes
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87fvcozfhf.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <87h9x5hwso.fsf@gmx.us> <87oarcbppe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35634)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1XySEZ-0006Tn-0J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:22:20 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1XySES-0006al-1T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:22:13 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:50240)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1XySER-0006ZT-Ny
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:22:07 -0500
Received: from W530 ([109.201.154.163]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJXEd-1Xzpnz32nz-0032Ac for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 22:21:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87oarcbppe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:14:37 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> First `org-footnote-section' could be nil, in which case there is no
> headline to look after.

Sure.

> Also, there may be multiple footnote sections in the included document,
> or even some footnote definitions inside and some outside the single
> section...

Multiple footnote sections are supported in the second revision of the
patch...

> You should only extract the definitions associated to the references
> within the included part of the document. However, you cannot insert
> them right after the included text, as it could break the surrounding
> environment, e.g.,
>
>   - item
>
>     #+INCLUDE: some-table.org
>
> A possible solution would be to somehow postpone insertion of footnotes
> at the very end of the source document, not at the location of the
> keyword. However it would need some testing.

Right, I note something similar in my second post.

       http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/93299

Clearly the current situation is not satisfactory ("You can use :lines,
but only if no footnotes are present. . .  IOW, :lines supports a subset
of Org syntax.").

I prefer converting [fn:N] references to [fn::FOOTNOTE] (see my other
email).  Any obvious downsides?

=E2=80=94Rasmus

--=20
Vote for proprietary math!