From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:34:26 +0200
Message-ID: <87fuoxjk71.fsf@bzg.fr>
References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org>
	<0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com>
	<83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1ble76-0001ty-BR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1ble74-0004rd-L1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Paul Rankin <hello@paulwrankin.com>

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> This fix looks fine, obviously. You can go ahead as far as Org is
> concerned.

+1

-- 
 Bastien