From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Org should follow SemVer conventions [Was: Automatically save
 the archive file after org-archive-subtree]
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 08:49:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87ftxfobr0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <f74fce15-c2ea-048e-b2ef-7ad40e717c89@arfer.net>
	<87tvlv4pv7.fsf@alphapapa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1g9lq2-0008LB-4f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:49:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1g9lpx-00076y-4E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:49:50 -0400
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:38559)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1g9lpw-00075G-Sm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 02:49:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tvlv4pv7.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Tue, 09
	Oct 2018 01:05:00 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:

> According to that bug report, the behavior changed when upgrading from
> 9.1.2 to 9.1.5.
>
> I think this shouldn't happen.  "Patch"-level releases (incrementing the
> third number) should only contain bug fixes.  Changes which change
> default behavior belong in, at minimum, "minor" releases (incrementing
> the second number).

[...]

> Could Org start doing this and call it Org 10.0?

We already do this. It just happens that this particular commit had
deeper repercussions than intended. It was then considered as a bugfix
and applied on the stable branch.

Moreover, next release will be Org 9.2. Not Org 10. I think Org 10 will
happen when some major part of Org changes, or when we drop support for
older Emacsen, e.g., Emacs 24.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou