From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Org Num library
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:29:07 +0000
Message-ID: <87ftvvz8lo.fsf@ossau.homelinux.net>
References: <87r2fftxq7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45970)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>) id 1gPEWE-0001XM-WE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:29:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>) id 1gPEW9-0000EM-KS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:29:18 -0500
Received: from ossau.homelinux.net ([18.217.239.99]:56310
	helo=ip-172-31-40-63.us-east-2.compute.internal)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>) id 1gPEW9-00008k-Fb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:29:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r2fftxq7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>, Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Since it is very much Org-specific, and a basic feature you could expect
> from Org, I'd like to add it in core. So, if there is no strong
> objection to it, it can go in Org 9.3.
>
> I attach the library for further testing, suggestions, remarks=E2=80=A6 L=
et me
> know what you think.

Well, with my Org 9.1.14, I can report that the code evaluates cleanly
and the feature works.  I can't see any objection to adding it into
core.

(I'd add that I'm not yet seeing a clear use case for it; but perhaps
that will change in future.)

     Neil