From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-notmuch: Improved tree support
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:19:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87ftqq577f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87h8bzb2jy.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87k1gbichc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87v9zn6qj8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58265)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1hED87-00074w-JC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:19:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1hED86-0000Kl-Mm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:19:07 -0400
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:35649)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1hED86-0000JE-F1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:19:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87v9zn6qj8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of
	"Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:23:55 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Patch attached.
> I'm just not sure about what the version number should be for
> deprecation.

Applied. I fixed the version number.

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou