From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id lB7BNG12716wGQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:02:05 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UOdRMG12715COwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:02:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5427D94053C for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jn1Tw-0002Fy-4G for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:02:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jn1TI-0002EA-8n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:01:24 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:34965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jn1TG-0003SG-1E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:01:23 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 77.199.131.162 Received: from localhost (162.131.199.77.rev.sfr.net [77.199.131.162]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EE7460004; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:01:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: [patch suggestion] Mitigating the poor Emacs performance on huge org files: Do not use overlays for PROPERTY and LOGBOOK drawers References: <87h7x9e5jo.fsf@localhost> <87blmxjckl.fsf@localhost> <87y2q13tgs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878si1j83x.fsf@localhost> <87d07bzvhd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87imh34usq.fsf@localhost> <87pnbby49m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tv0efvyd.fsf@localhost> <874kse1seu.fsf@localhost> <87r1vhqpja.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tv0d2nk7.fsf@localhost> <87o8qkhy3g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sgfqu5av.fsf@localhost> <87sgfn6qpc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87367d4ydc.fsf@localhost> <87r1uuotw8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mu5iq618.fsf@localhost> <87ftb9pqop.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <875zc2du63.fsf@localhost> <87wo4en8qk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pn9s7nku.fsf@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Ihor Radchenko , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:01:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pn9s7nku.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:52:33 +0800") Message-ID: <87ftaozcn9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.195; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/21 11:01:17 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: pY87HZ7g2Jnm Hello, Ihor Radchenko writes: > I am currently working on org-fold.el. However, I am not sure if it is > acceptable to move some of the existing functions from org.el to > org-fold.el. > > Specifically, functions from the following sections of org.el might be > moved to org-fold.el: >> ;;; Visibility (headlines, blocks, drawers) >> ;;;; Reveal point location >> ;;;; Visibility cycling > > Should I do it? That makes sense, yes. Note that you can first copy and rename most functions to make the transition easier. As a second step, we can plug new functions into the main system. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou