* Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
@ 2009-05-03 19:29 Tassilo Horn
2009-05-03 19:52 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2009-05-03 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Hi all,
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
I use a lot of elisp addons, so loading the site-lisp files takes quite
some time and some packages like CEDET even print messages while loading
and obfuscate the compile output. I changed the Makefile to use -Q
instead of -q which omits loading of site-lisp files, and it still
compiles fine but much faster.
Bye,
Tassilo
--
Chuck Norris likes his ice like he likes his skulls: crushed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
2009-05-03 19:29 Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Tassilo Horn
@ 2009-05-03 19:52 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-05-04 12:17 ` David Bremner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-05-03 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> emacs
> -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
Hi Tassilo,
this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
am not even sure about Emacs 22.
- Carsten
>
> I use a lot of elisp addons, so loading the site-lisp files takes
> quite
> some time and some packages like CEDET even print messages while
> loading
> and obfuscate the compile output. I changed the Makefile to use -Q
> instead of -q which omits loading of site-lisp files, and it still
> compiles fine but much faster.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
> --
> Chuck Norris likes his ice like he likes his skulls: crushed.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
2009-05-03 19:52 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2009-05-04 12:17 ` David Bremner
2009-05-04 14:08 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-05-04 15:36 ` Tassilo Horn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Bremner @ 2009-05-04 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode
At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> > emacs
> > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>
> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
> am not even sure about Emacs 22.
at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has
"-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be
possible to do something similar. Of course then you have switches
depending on Emacs family, and I could see that being too much
trouble.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
2009-05-04 12:17 ` David Bremner
@ 2009-05-04 14:08 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-05-04 15:36 ` Tassilo Horn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-05-04 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Bremner; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode
On May 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, David Bremner wrote:
>
> At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>>> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
>>> emacs
>>> -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>>
>> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
>> am not even sure about Emacs 22.
>
> at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has
> "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be
> possible to do something similar. Of course then you have switches
> depending on Emacs family, and I could see that being too much
> trouble.
Yes, I prefer to just keep -q which is compatible. Otherwise the
installation instructions will become more complicated.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
2009-05-04 12:17 ` David Bremner
2009-05-04 14:08 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2009-05-04 15:36 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-05-05 8:29 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2009-05-04 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Bremner; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> writes:
>> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
>> > emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>>
>> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I am not
>> even sure about Emacs 22.
>
> at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has
> "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be
> possible to do something similar.
Yeah, -Q is equivalent to -q --no-site-file, so the latter could be used
and still we're compatible with emacs 22/23 & xemacs.
Bye,
Tassilo
--
"Emacs is not a development tool but a way of life."
- David Kastrup in alt.religion.emacs -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
2009-05-04 15:36 ` Tassilo Horn
@ 2009-05-05 8:29 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-05-05 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, David Bremner
Done, thanks.
I am using -no-site-file instead of --no-site-file, this seems to
works best
with different Emacsen..
- Carsten
On May 4, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> writes:
>
>>>> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
>>>> emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
>>>
>>> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I am
>>> not
>>> even sure about Emacs 22.
>>
>> at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has
>> "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be
>> possible to do something similar.
>
> Yeah, -Q is equivalent to -q --no-site-file, so the latter could be
> used
> and still we're compatible with emacs 22/23 & xemacs.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
> --
> "Emacs is not a development tool but a way of life."
> - David Kastrup in alt.religion.emacs -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-05 8:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-03 19:29 Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Tassilo Horn
2009-05-03 19:52 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-05-04 12:17 ` David Bremner
2009-05-04 14:08 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-05-04 15:36 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-05-05 8:29 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).