From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: New exporter, beamer confusion
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:57:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehgtmd0q.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFniQ7WXLM5wUuo75-DUcrpxjg7vvUVG1HF6ODz-r59o6E-WcQ@mail.gmail.com> (James Harkins's message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:12:05 +0800")
James Harkins <jamshark70@gmail.com> writes:
> Btw, *who* preferred \alert? (Orwell, Politics and the English Language:
> "Never use the passive [voice] where you can use the active.")
Obviously, me, as the author of the back-end. Org offers only one slot
for "strong emphasis". I had to choose between bold and alert, and so
I did.
> Although I'm not happy about manual intervention to convert my prior work,
> this is a good step toward consistency. It was odd, in the old framework,
> to use headlines for bullet lists and org's numbered lists for numbered
> lists. "An org list becomes an output list" is an easier rule to
> explain.
As explained in this thread, the H:num options item defines a limit
between regular headlines and "low-level" headlines. Low level headlines
are usually turned into lists during export. But, in the Beamer
exporter, it is a better idea to turn them into blocks. Better as in
"closer, by its properties, to an headline".
> Still, I wonder if there is a way to make the new backend less unfriendly
> toward lists. It's an interesting philosophical question: In what cases is
> it better for the tool to adapt to the users' wishes, versus cases where
> the tool should encourage (Are blocks in the result actually better than
> lists? Who says so, and why should I take his or her word for it?)
Nobody is saying that blocks are better than lists in the output. It's
a matter of taste, isn't it? There are also ways to adapt the tool to
your wishes (through hooks, filters, script, macros).
> "Reasonably" for me would mean tweaking some configuration options and
> perhaps changing a few minor details of the markup. If you have to change
> the org document's structure (e.g., converting headlines to lists), it
> isn't backward compatible.
Then, by this definition, it isn't, indeed.
> For comparison: Lilypond updates frequently break some details of backward
> compatibility. So, they ship a "convert-ly" script to handle many of those
> changes automatically.
Even though the required change in our case are rather minimal, they
mostly depend on the user configuration. Hence, I will not attempt to
provide such a script.
But I will provide instructions on how to make the transition, if they
are needed.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-06 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-09 16:37 org-url-hexify-p is not respected James Harkins
2012-09-10 1:50 ` James Harkins
2012-09-10 4:58 ` Nick Dokos
2012-09-10 6:16 ` James Harkins
2012-09-10 6:37 ` Jambunathan K
2012-09-10 6:48 ` James Harkins
2012-09-10 7:12 ` Jambunathan K
[not found] ` <CAFniQ7W_5QMUawD2NObyhy2_Y647as-NthobZ9OgAX4NLcVJBw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-11 10:22 ` James Harkins
2012-09-11 13:10 ` Activating modules before org-install (was: org-url-hexify-p is not respected) Memnon Anon
2012-09-11 13:56 ` Jonathan Leech-Pepin
2012-09-11 17:06 ` org-url-hexify-p is not respected Charles Philip Chan
2012-09-23 10:05 ` Bastien
2012-09-26 17:59 ` Michael Brand
2012-09-26 21:50 ` Bastien
2012-09-27 6:18 ` Michael Brand
[not found] ` <jamshark70@gmail.com>
2012-08-12 2:55 ` MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory? James Harkins
2012-08-12 4:29 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-12 7:12 ` James Harkins
2012-08-12 8:43 ` Bastien
2012-08-12 8:50 ` James Harkins
2012-08-12 13:11 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-18 23:25 ` Adam Spiers
2012-08-19 1:35 ` Adam Spiers
2012-08-19 5:49 ` James Harkins
2012-08-20 20:03 ` Rémi Vanicat
2012-08-19 2:41 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-12 11:38 ` James Harkins
2012-08-12 12:40 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-12 13:12 ` Nick Dokos
2012-09-29 16:34 ` LaTeX beamer export: relative file links? Nick Dokos
2012-09-30 2:04 ` James Harkins
2013-01-10 3:40 ` <M-S-left/right> changed? Nick Dokos
2013-01-10 9:17 ` James Harkins
2013-02-05 7:21 ` New exporter, beamer confusion Nick Dokos
2013-02-05 9:01 ` James Harkins
2013-02-05 13:20 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-02-05 13:55 ` Nick Dokos
2013-02-05 19:03 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-06 0:11 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-06 18:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-06 22:39 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-07 12:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
[not found] ` <37646106030B4CA98C6A7717FBD89D50@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87vca4jigj.fsf@gmail.com>
2013-02-07 14:49 ` Vincent Beffara
2013-02-07 14:58 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-07 17:08 ` Rasmus
2013-02-07 21:48 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-07 23:38 ` Rasmus
2013-02-08 21:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-08 13:40 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-06 2:12 ` James Harkins
2013-02-06 4:35 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-06 12:32 ` Rasmus
2013-02-06 13:12 ` Suvayu Ali
2013-02-06 13:45 ` Sebastien Vauban
2013-02-06 19:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2013-02-07 1:32 ` James Harkins
2013-02-05 9:36 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-25 6:25 ` How to make the new exporter open PDF using evince? James Harkins
2013-02-25 7:01 ` Mike Gauland
2013-02-25 6:52 ` Nick Dokos
2013-02-25 13:06 ` James Harkins
2013-02-26 2:40 ` Martin Marier
2013-02-27 9:51 ` James Harkins
[not found] <CAFniQ7UgwaQ5jO2r7iJ7PbakWfpvsJGZw2FNNf+sawwvKqSUqQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-29 5:55 ` LaTeX beamer export: relative file links? James Harkins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-10 2:38 <M-S-left/right> changed? James Harkins
2013-02-04 4:00 New exporter, beamer confusion James Harkins
2013-02-04 6:39 ` Suvayu Ali
2013-02-04 8:55 ` James Harkins
2013-02-04 19:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-05 0:09 ` James Harkins
2013-02-05 12:32 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-05 18:06 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-05 23:49 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehgtmd0q.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net \
--cc=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).