From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Attributes on HTML tables?
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:13:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehedctd7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130413204259.GA66764@BigDog.local
Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 01:31:17PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>>
>> > François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> >
>> >> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>> >>
>> >>>> The first step is probably to research the differences between xhtml and
>> >>>> html 5.
>> >>
>> >>> Well, I would even skip this step and just hack something usable.
>>
>>
>> I sort of fudged on the below. The upside is that it should be pretty
>> forgiving now: you can set all kinds of strings as your :html-doctype,
>> and it will do a reasonably good job of guessing how to handle it.
>>
>> Barring actual bugs or poor design decisions, what's left to do is:
>>
>> 1. Make sure that inlined script and style chunks are escaped correctly,
>> I seem to remember reading that the commenting/escaping syntax for these
>> chunks varies according to html flavor.
>>
>> 2. I'd like to add the possibility to put an arbitrary :html-container
>
>> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
>> #+TITLE: HTML 5 Test
>> #+DATE: {{{modification-time(%Y-%m-%d)}}}
>> #+HTML_DOCTYPE: html5
>> #+BIND: org-html-divs ((preamble "header" "preamble") (content "section" "content") (postamble "footer" "postamble"))
>> * Org HTML5 Test
>> #+ATTR_HTML: :options html-container article
>
> note that you just just set #+HTML_CONTAINER: article in the head of the
> file if you want all the containers to be "article"s.
That would be pretty drastic, though -- it would wrap "article" around a
whole bunch of stuff that shouldn't be an article! I think ultimately
the HTML exporter should grow a slightly more flexible system for
wrapping document sections in containers, but this patch definitely
shouldn't get hung up on that.
>> +(defconst org-html-doctype-alist
>> + '(("html4" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN\">")
>> + ("html4-strict" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN\">
>> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd\"")
>> + ("xhtml" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN\"
>> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd\">")
>> + ("html5" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML>"))
>
> I believe that should be (note the lowercase "html"):
>
> ("xhtml" . "<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN\"
>> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd\">")
> ("html5" . "<!DOCTYPE html>")
>
> See http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp for a fairly
> complete list of valid doctypes.
Cool, thanks for the reference. If the approach of this patch seems
generally acceptable I'll try to add most of the commonly-used doctypes
in there. I'm waffling on XHTML5, though -- from what I can tell it's a
spec everyone sort of thought ought to be in there, but no one is
actually using.
E
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-14 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-07 2:55 Attributes on HTML tables? François Pinard
2013-04-07 6:27 ` Bastien
2013-04-07 14:42 ` Christian Moe
2013-04-07 18:46 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-04-07 20:39 ` Christian Moe
2013-04-07 20:48 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-04-08 21:09 ` Christian Moe
2013-04-10 17:44 ` François Pinard
2013-04-12 2:06 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2013-04-12 5:42 ` Bastien
2013-04-12 6:01 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2013-04-12 8:46 ` Bastien
2013-04-12 14:36 ` François Pinard
2013-04-13 3:38 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2013-04-13 5:31 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2013-04-13 20:42 ` Rick Frankel
2013-04-14 10:13 ` Eric Abrahamsen [this message]
2013-04-14 18:01 ` Rick Frankel
2013-04-15 18:03 ` Rick Frankel
2013-04-13 17:10 ` Rick Frankel
2013-04-14 8:41 ` Bastien
2013-04-10 19:37 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-04-11 8:28 ` Christian Moe
2013-04-11 10:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-04-11 12:14 ` Christian Moe
2013-04-11 15:34 ` Bastien
2013-04-11 17:29 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehedctd7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net \
--to=eric@ericabrahamsen.net \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).