From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: parser: verbatim or code? Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:20:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87eh33s9ag.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87iosg1oge.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87mwhsfo9e.fsf@gmail.com> <87ob27tp8p.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExtw-0005in-KY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:20:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExtr-00014h-1F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:20:40 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:54453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WExtq-00014Y-QE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:20:34 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u57so9674947wes.41 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 01:20:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ob27tp8p.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> (Yasushi SHOJI's message of "Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:51:02 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Yasushi SHOJI Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Yasushi SHOJI writes: > Nick Dokos wrote: >> >> I think it's a code bug: ~verbatim~ is the precedent-setting latex >> convention. >> >> However fixing it might break existing documents (although in many >> instances code and verbatim are treated equivalently, so that might >> not be much of a problem). > > A quick grep on export back-ends reveals that some back-ends uses them > differently. Namely > > - latex > - man > - org ;-) > - texinfo > > Should I just leave as-is? If we leave it as-is, documentation needs to be updated anyway. If we do change them, it should only happen in "org-element.el". I don't think that would break existing documents, as code and verbatim are really close to each other. I don't care either way. Though, I lean towards the first option, as I like "=" as verbatim (which may be the source of the initial confusion). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou