From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: #+INCLUDE: myfile.html html does not include /literally/; Org processes Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87egz8zowa.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <538AA6B8.40604@gmail.com> <8761kl12w9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bnudf2u4.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqd1yo84.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8738fpeyov.fsf@gmail.com> <87sinpylly.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r438eujq.fsf@gmail.com> <87iookzsto.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fvjoenlt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr6jJ-00089A-4v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:27:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr6jC-0001tS-Ns for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:27:21 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr6jC-0001t1-Hq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 10:27:14 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wr6jA-0007YH-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:27:12 +0200 Received: from pd9eb2b91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.43.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:27:12 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb2b91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 16:27:12 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > However, note that "wrap" is confusing because it sounds like Babel's > keyword and yet does something different. I'm not wedded to the name, maybe "export" has a nicer ring to it (but that#s also been used differently in Babel, just like almost anything else you#d be able to come up with). >> And since I think the list of NAMES that fit this description and is >> known in advance (by org syntax) ... > > Unfortunately, that assumption is slightly wrong. Export blocks are > defined by export back-ends. If the export back-end is not loaded, the > block is a special block. What I'm talking about is the list of blocks that never can be export blocks (CENTER, QUOTE, SRC, COMMENT, EXAMPLE, VERSE). These can be flagged as errors, anything else is the responsibility of the user. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra