From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:55:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87egq7feni.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87iofkdr6o.fsf@pank.eu> <87oapblpvc.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIb8m-0005bf-4e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 05:55:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIb8f-0002JJ-Uo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 05:55:31 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YIb8f-0002J4-OD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 05:55:25 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YIb8a-00058Z-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:55:20 +0100 Received: from tsn109-201-154-193.dyn.nltelcom.net ([109.201.154.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:55:20 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn109-201-154-193.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:55:20 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Vikas Rawal writes: > Org-ref is very functional and has so far been able to deal with much > of my needs. So, I just hope we are not trying to fix something that > is not broken. IMO for the same reason it is attractive to limit *bold* to imply bold. [At one point it was possible to alter the (export) interpretation of emphases]. Home-brewed solution are not stable compared to syntax. Getting ad-hoc citations in Org is very and there might be as many implementations as there are users. E.g. org-ruby would not (I hope) support [MY-CITE:MY-DOI]... > The real need in the context of citations is to somehow extend the > bibtex/biblatex integration to other export formats (odt/html, most > importantly). Will all the new stuff that is being proposed take us in > that direction? That is /a/ problem but not /the/ problem. E.g. some people prefer Zotero. Some might prefer DOI. If you can live with \cite-only there's already ox-bibtex.el that will support bibtex citations in html. —Rasmus -- May contains speling mistake