From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Requests about the code demarcation Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:58:31 -0600 Message-ID: <87d3rz1be0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878w2xfllt.fsf@gmail.com> <877hihdqtz.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwx4sco2.fsf@gmail.com> <87iq20p473.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <4C9865B2.1040103@christianmoe.com> <871v8nfd2i.fsf@gmail.com> <4C98C2A8.1080709@christianmoe.com> <87mxrb40d8.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87eicnaz3y.fsf@gmail.com> <87sk0zqnpe.fsf_-_@mundaneum.com> <87ocbj1g0t.fsf@gmail.com> <878w2n9u2k.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87r5gf8d95.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42835 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0FAA-0005L8-GB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FA7-0001Hd-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:42 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:41800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FA7-0001HO-LB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:39 -0400 Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so3279704pxi.0 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:58:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r5gf8d95.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban"'s message of "Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:36:22 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Seb, I plan to extend the block demarcation function to all block types, but haven't yet found the time. Best -- Eric S=C3=A9bastien Vauban writes: > Hi Eric, > > S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote: >> "Eric Schulte" wrote: >>> S=C3=A9bastien Vauban writes: >>>> Is it possible to envision completion of the language name? Writing >>>> =3Demacs-lisp=3D could become easier... >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestions, I've just implemented them. >> >> Tested. Simply fan-tas-tic! > > Just one question: about =3Dquote=3D and such environments, I don't remem= ber if it > already is supported by the code demarcation, or has just been discussed = so > far. > > - In the first case, it would be missing from the list of "languages". > - In the second case, I'm not in a hurry -- I really don't use such > environments yet! > > Best regards, > Seb