From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: [Accepted] Re: Bug: Jumping to a date in the agenda changes view back to 'day' [7.4 (release_7.4.80.g0e5e5)] Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3mos6vr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110201115210.6AD9A8783@myhost.localdomain> <87wrlfl1jx.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87sjvzaezr.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <871v3hjhac.fsf@gnu.org> <8AA3F93A-FFEC-4D8B-941C-22DBD8D05082@gmail.com> <87oc6kupqf.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87y65ow14i.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <8739nwrm7m.fsf@gnu.org> <097F3E2B-6A1A-433D-B02C-218E26BA1440@gmail.com> <878vxdctma.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49200 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqjF0-0006Sl-PW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:36:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqjEz-0001ly-Oz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:36:38 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:58633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqjEz-0001ls-D9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:36:37 -0500 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so4821807fxm.0 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:36:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:42:55 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Julien Danjou , =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Melis , Org Mode List Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > wow, you found your way through the agenda code maze. Yeah, the trip in the code was really a-mazing :) > Looks good to me! Thanks for getting this fixed, so > that Juliens cleaner implementation can stay the basis > for time span setting. This basis is quite an improvement, so it deserved the time spent to fix this bug (and to learn the code)... -- Bastien