From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Bug: Export to Latex - Incorrect output for list items starting with left bracket [8.2.3c (8.2.3c-elpa @ /Users/jdegenhardt/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20131115/)] Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:54:15 +0000 Message-ID: <87d2jubaqg.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <1389475109.23348.YahooMailNeo@web184706.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <87sisrkepy.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhyiv7pt.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87zjmyl80v.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3A4P-0004v3-1z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:54:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3A4E-0003xt-QW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:54:40 -0500 Received: from mail14-co1on0066.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com ([157.56.73.66]:26401 helo=CO1EHSNDR002.bigfish.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3A4E-0003wN-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:54:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zjmyl80v.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:42:40 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Jon Degenhardt , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Nicolas Goaziou writes: [...] > I sometimes use this feature, too. But, admittedly, it is a hack. I guess it depends on the definition of /hack/... I think of it as a feature of lists in LaTeX. Whether this is view extends to org is of course open to debate. [...] > Unfortunately, I can't see how to not break your documents if we fix the > problem. If this is considered a problem, and you intend to fix it, then there is no way to avoid causing me difficulties. Although I would obviously prefer to keep the status quo, as I find this "feature" convenient, please don't let the inconvenience to me stop you fixing this. It won't take me that long to fix. >> In fact, I had started preparing an email to ask the check lists make >> use of this feature to make these lists look nicer when exported to >> LaTeX. For instance, if we have [...] > This is orthogonal to the issue at hand. It is indeed. Apologies for conflating the two. > The problem is not the checkbox but what comes after. I am not sure what you mean here? > IOW, this feature can be implemented with or > without fixing the bug above (also, a filter can do the job). Yes, I appreciate this. A filter is likely what I will end up using. Today I simply edited the LaTeX as I needed to get a document of actions etc. out to a bunch of people quickly. Thanks for your quick response and please do change the handling of []s if you think it would be for the org community's benefit. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.5d-479-g8694aa