From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Subject: Re: stable org-plus-contrib Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:20:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1bfled3.fsf@russet.org.uk> References: <8760h8h162.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87pofgl82d.fsf@jaunder.io> <87ziejlh6p.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8o0t-0003p0-K3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:20:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8o0o-000314-Mi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:20:15 -0400 Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([78.129.138.110]:45982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8o0o-0002z4-BZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:20:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Thu, 11 May 2017 13:00:18 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Michael Alan Dorman , emacs-org list Kaushal Modi writes: > On Thu, May 11, 2017, 8:20 AM Phillip Lord > wrote: > >> >> Really? That's rather confusing. So, it means that a bug here is a bug >> in a release version? >> > > Well, a bug's not a bug till it is seen :) > > What is the buggy behavior that you find in the Elpa version? I'm afraid that I didn't note them carefully enough to report. I just assumed I was on a unstable version. I can cope with being on an something unstable in general, but don't really have the time to do this for org also. > Simply put, the Melpa version has the latest weekly cut from the maint > branch (minus the contrib packages), the org Elpa version is the same but > with contrib packages. So those are stable versions. If one finds a bug in > those, then they get fixed when reported. Okay, so the last point release with bug fixes? It should be version 9.0 essentially? > New big features get added to the master (devel) branch. > > That said, I have been using the master branch as my daily driver for over > a year. As of now I don't see any bug that affects my workflow. Well, you'd probably fix it if there was:-) Phil