Re: Suggestion: User-contributed use-cases on orgmode.org ?

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com> writes:

> In worg-about, it looks like the repo is ~bzg/worg on src.ht, but "worg"
> doesn't come up in the project search on src.ht (but "org" does).  Is
> the repo hidden (I don't have an account on src.ht yet -- perhaps
> sourcehut should be explained a bit in worg-about).

May you please provide more details?
Do you refer to <https://orgmode.org/worg/worg-about.html>?
FYI, WORG is listed in "Repositories" right at https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/

>> Alternatively, perhaps the key element of "wiki" for some is "web
>> accessible editing", in which case I wonder if using EmacsWiki would
>> make sense.
>
> Duh! Why did I forget about EmacsWiki?!?  Web accessible editing is a
> plus to allow organic growth to the wiki -- as long as some rules are
> followed. Wikis allow easy undoing of page edits (if necessary) and (I
> think) locking pages to be edited only by a few people (creator/admins).
> There could be a talk page for suggesting additions to a use-case to
> make it more flexible which the use-creator creator could test and
> incoporate into the use-case (or just tag it as interesting).

Currently, we prefer all the discussions, including discussions of WORG
pages, to happen on this mailing list. 

One interesting idea could be showing the comment threads right on the
WORG pages, similar to
https://isso-comments.de/
https://staticman.net/
https://meta.discourse.org/t/embed-discourse-comments-on-another-website-via-javascript/31963
https://amnesiak.org/post/2021/01/30/hugo-blog-with-mastodon-comments-extended/

Or we might consider https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/woof to automatically update
WORG pages for appropriately marked mailing list threads.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>