From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: [babel] R questions Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:58:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87bpi9aish.fsf@mundaneum.com> References: <87tyw674n2.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87aaxy8czu.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Dan and Eric, I have a side question, but I think this is of general interest for others = as well. I almost don't know GnuPlot neither R -- yes, before seeing the light, I us= ed Excel for all my graphs. So, my question is: for typical small plots (piecharts and barplots), is th= ere any Org-babel reason that would advocate for doing it in one of the two abo= ve language preferably than in the other one? Reasons could be better integration (for editing or (re-)generating the graphs), simpler semantics (with NA values, for example), etc. Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode