From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Some projects Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:16:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnbmapq4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87wpub9jts.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87eggjar5u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNw4-0004km-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:14:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNw3-0002BC-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:14:20 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:52789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqNw3-0002B0-7X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:14:19 -0400 Received: from selenimh (unknown [IPv6:2a01:6600:8080:9601::2de]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C2C0A80AD for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:14:18 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87eggjar5u.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:45:01 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List Eric S Fraga writes: > I'm concerned that it will make typing normal text more onerous. Right > now, org is quite non-intrusive in most of my writing yet is quite rich > in what it can encode. Having to backslash symbols that I use in text > quite often (especially square brackets) would be annoying. Maybe I > misunderstood; if so, I apologise for the noise! This is also my concern. I don't want to add complexity to typing in Org, at all. Yet, if this feature is correctly defined, this should disambiguate some annoying situations (e.g., [1] when you do not want a footnote reference). > Regarding citations, I have not played with the -wip branch at > all. Maybe I should. It just wasn't clear where that branch had got to > and whether it was at a point worth trying. Can you (or somebody else) > update us with a summary of what is possible? I cannot. I just implemented the syntax. Others implemented tools on top of it. I don't know the current state of this. Regards,