From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-attach-commit optional
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:29:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87bn7n5f5s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87pow4rxzd.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net>
	<87io1vy5ob.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87io1vs10g.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36813)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aTv1i-0002vW-LS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:27:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aTv1h-0008IE-Fm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:27:34 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:37716)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1aTv1h-0008HV-AE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:27:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87io1vs10g.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> (John J. Foerch's message of
	"Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:46:39 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@earthlink.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

John J Foerch <jjfoerch@earthlink.net> writes:

> I would be glad to do the paperwork, but as it's such a simple change, I
> have no objections to anybody else implementing this feature request in
> my place if they want to.  I think it would save time.

There is no rush. Besides, your patch can still fit within the
TINYCHANGE limit, albeit it would unfortunately be the last one.

> Let me know if this works for this community, or whether it is
> preferred for me to go through the FSF process.

I think the best solution for the community is to finish the patch and
apply it with a TINYCHANGE tag, while at the same time going through the
FSF process for future patches. It's always best to eat the cake and
have it too.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou