From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: Clocking work time vs. office time
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:28:33 +0200
Message-ID: <87bn4rvcdq.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <8737q4x48t.fsf@mbork.pl> <amlbvcx5ch.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de>
	<87lh3wv6ci.fsf@mbork.pl> <8lkcvcxdvt.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de>
	<87inz0ur3t.fsf@mbork.pl> <17pdvcxts5.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53136)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1awOOh-000473-Qf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 02:29:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1awOOW-0007HX-49
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 02:28:54 -0400
Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([2a01:5e00:2:52::8]:46516)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1awOOV-0007FM-T0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 02:28:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <17pdvcxts5.ln2@news.c0t0d0s0.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On 2016-04-30, at 06:34, Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> [...]
>> Now that I think of it, I guess it might be better/easier to check the
>> network SSID.  Thanks for the idea!
> that would work as well. You can even probe the SSID without actually
> connecting to the network.

Interesting, how to do that?

> Regards
> hmw

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University