From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:25:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87aag9bzhx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <20110322051038.21655c80@kuru.homelinux.net> <80d3lj9wj6.fsf@somewhere.org> <20110322053134.669127e9@kuru.homelinux.net> <8999.1300804510@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20110322160814.227fc53f@bhishma.homelinux.net> <27844.1300836065@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <8162r9hgxm.fsf@gmail.com> <87bp11dk4h.fsf@gnu.org> <87tyejymto.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38034 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5j8b-0005Jw-Mt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:32:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5j2K-0004Xk-08 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:25:34 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5j2J-0004XO-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:25:31 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5j2H-0005Cz-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:25:29 +0200 Received: from p57aabf54.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.170.191.84]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:25:29 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by p57aabf54.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:25:29 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas writes: > I have been thinking about exporters for a while now, and I'd like to > share my point of view. Be warned, I will be a bit verbose. [...] +1 A remark about backwards compatibility: I personally don't have a huge investment in documents that I export, but I guess that backwards compatibility and/or a converter that points out and possibly fixes any incompatibility between old and new exporters would be required to make the transition smoothly. Again, the changes envisioned by Nicholas would require that the orgg documents in question are well-formed (or at least fixable for the purposes of the export with trivial and stable changes). The situation today is that some export backends require different levels of conformance while this new solution would require the same quality for all of them. Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds