From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:27:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9yhzgq7.fsf@pank.lan> References: <87ipd5iu9v.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svn7E-0001B2-92 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:22:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svn7A-0007ki-9l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:22:20 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Svn79-0007kI-Ry for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:22:15 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Svn74-0007Wn-SG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:22:10 +0200 Received: from 194.66.250.127 ([194.66.250.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:22:10 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 194.66.250.127 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:22:10 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > I don't think this is about plain text vs à la XML (because XML and > friends are plain text too) but about whether we should allow a new > type of block to keep non-human-readable stuff out of the way. How about just allowing for a list of properties being hidden. For instance all uuid properties could be hidden. –Rasmus -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it