From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexis Subject: Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development .... Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 10:56:37 +1000 Message-ID: <87a97e1mp3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFvMu-0001dP-L0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:22:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFvMl-0007m5-Im for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:22:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:60177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFvMl-0007ls-Av for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:22:39 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y10so7838331pdj.21 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 18:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ppp118-209-47-36.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net. [118.209.47.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm6401066pdr.45.2014.08.08.18.22.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Aug 2014 18:22:36 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hi all, In light of recent discussions about 'MobileOrg' - which seemingly actually constitutes two distinct projects for two different platforms - together with the apparent relative lack of activity of both projects, despite demand for them, i can't help but wonder if the 'MobileOrg' endeavour needs a reboot. More specifically, it seems to me that rebuilding MobileOrg as a single project on top of Apache Cordova: https://cordova.apache.org/ might be a way forward, for several reasons: * It would help ensure that basically the same set of functionality is available across platforms, modulo specific limitations/issues with specific platforms. And when people add or modify core functionality, that functionality would more easily become available to people across platforms, rather than the functionality being initially implemented on platform X, and people on platform Y having to wait for it to be implemented in its entirety. * Overall, only one lot of end-user documentation would need to be maintained. * It would enable MobileOrg to be made available for mobile platforms other than Android and iOS, such as Windows Phone and Blackberry. * The number of people available to assist with development might well be greater, due to the core development environment involving HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Barriers to entry for both regular and occasional committers would be much lower. i'm aware that Cordova has various limitations, including-but-not-limited-to the lack of native 'feel' of Cordova-based applications. However, i feel that the above advantages, combined with the my notion that Emacs users are probably less concerned with a perfectly slick UI than with having access to functionality they need/want, probably outweighs such limitations. Unfortunately, due to other existing commitments, i wouldn't be able to take point on such a reboot. But i'd definitely be willing and able to help out! Particularly in the area of contact management and syncing, of course. :-) Thoughts/comments/criticisms? Alexis.