From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:20:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8sehqdk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87zj0fd07u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeHwE-0006Jz-07 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:24:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeHw9-0002KR-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:24:30 -0400 Received: from mail-db3on0104.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.104]:43487 helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeHw8-0002Jr-OE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:24:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zj0fd07u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:46:45 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Monday, 21 Sep 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > Thank you. But can't users needing a non-default class customize their > own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out > of the box? Only that the koma-script classes are arguably better defaults than the actual defaults... Personally, I cannot see any reason to use the standard article/report/letter classes! -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3.1-239-gd01560