From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Could we get rid of Org specific "mark ring"
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 03:21:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87a7tp1m2o.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87o9lcntdq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87efj1mtid.fsf@bzg.fr>
	<CAJcAo8sdmsNrxjeQ4QMwGrPrq_vb_z7+BZ9Sav4r6A0iBMTcZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60723)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1fBs4V-0003Sf-HJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:21:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1fBs4U-0003HF-Qv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:21:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8sdmsNrxjeQ4QMwGrPrq_vb_z7+BZ9Sav4r6A0iBMTcZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:32:27 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Hi Samuel,

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> On 4/26/18, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Good idea, +1 for me.
>
> i'd actually stay on an old version of org forever just to avoid the
> org mark ring being removed.  when i click on a link [or similar], i
> want a single command that is guaranteed to go back to the exact
> location.

Why would that be impossible to achieve with emacs mark?

-- 
 Bastien