From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id HwGIOw45N2AIGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:43:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id uBzCNg45N2AybwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:43:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EC91FD6B for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 06:43:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF9R7-0001El-GA for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:43:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF9PQ-0000dC-Rk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:41:56 -0500 Received: from out0.migadu.com ([94.23.1.103]:29889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF9PI-0003UO-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:41:56 -0500 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1614231705; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=swr91UailzpAw5ctXIb5KBh11S4H7sBHrBBIAGOlJ+g=; b=aYr9CRdQqGGXMT+GZr2qCUY4Xio+oABApDqXX4/cm/6z/PPqBmHjQAbg+iiy9XgtrP/qRp xafHuNlftg+A//Z7GK1+SgjfxHthKVc0E6SXKqVNdNOQKXOJenq5bZKYcmn5ooShp2olHS 448BONJLX+aotDUl+/xduBJmUmd+MIrOqXjfYLd/YeaCMDkbHzHRY/5n6o5mGlPmrHRDBI mulnGhBA1w9PDL8P5GwTWJ1m1ZF7ePRq8/QcxTF88Os/E9IU02HTYL+AYdhcA6uM0JrBQV Q5k5WCdYF7gEJwluAKDtEAc0pGpP00j75WcR0LtMpm1CBaFlaeyQvWy39e6ogg== From: Kyle Meyer To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: Using lexical-binding In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:41:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87a6rsg0vb.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=94.23.1.103; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=out0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.07 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=key1 header.b=aYr9CRdQ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 46EC91FD6B X-Spam-Score: -1.07 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: FWZzeuMmPKfx Stefan Monnier writes: > Since I'm not using it, I can't really test the result in any meaningful > way. Furthermore, just like `calendar.el`, it relies on dynamic scoping > and `eval` in all kinds of ways, so it's very difficult to be sure the > result is "sufficiently similar" to the old behavior not to break some > funky use somewhere out there. I probably don't use many fancy agenda features, but I do work regularly from it. Running with these changes throughout today, I didn't notice any issues. Within the next few days, I'll try to test some non-default settings and more obscure features that I don't use as part of my normal workflow, and see if I can find any problems. I'll also push the current changes to scratch/sm/agenda-lexical with the hope that others will test and report back.