From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: Robert Horn <rjhorn@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Prefix arguments, checklists, and lists
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v7q2o9b.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3pq13kaau.fsf@quad.robs.office> (Robert Horn's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:07:37 -0500")
Hello,
Robert Horn <rjhorn@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> The keystroke bindings for lists need some examination and repair. In 7.9.3 the situation is:
>
> | Keystrokes | First Item | Any other item |
> |---------------------+-----------------------------------+---------------------------|
> | C-c C-c | Toggle completion this item | Toggle this item |
> | C-u C-c C-c | Toggle checkbox on/off whole list | Toggle checkbox this item |
> | C-u C-u C-c C-c | Set in-progess whole list | Set in-progress this item |
> | M-- C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item |
> | M-- C-u C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item |
> | M-- C-u C-u C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item |
>
>
> Is this what is really intended? The present behavior has the odd
> result that there is no sequence to toggle presence of checkbox for
> the first item, and there is no sequence to set in-progress for the
> first item. The first item must be manually edited. (Or maybe there's
> another sequence that I haven't found.)
>
> I think this is a bug. But the intended behavior is unclear, and the
> proper fix is unclear.
I plan to rewrite C-c C-c using Elements, so the behaviour will slightly
change.
It will be better to discuss about checkboxes when this change is done.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 17:07 Prefix arguments, checklists, and lists Robert Horn
2013-01-18 21:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2013-01-21 16:31 ` Robert Horn
2013-01-25 13:58 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-03 17:24 ` Robert Horn
2013-02-04 22:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-07 8:33 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878v7q2o9b.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rjhorn@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).