From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Sosa Subject: Re: Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development .... Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: <878umsuiz1.fsf@gnusosa.net> References: <87a97e1mp3.fsf@gmail.com> <8638d6wav8.fsf@gmail.com> <53eaba61.0315320a.67ec.ffffc1ed@mx.google.com> <53eacc31.8649320a.5dd1.084d@mx.google.com> <87ha1hxfq1.fsf@gmail.com> <878umsstbn.fsf@generowicz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHgzH-0000Tp-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:25:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHgzB-0001rL-PN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:25:42 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHgzB-0001r3-Cu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:25:37 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XHgzA-0005Nn-CG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:25:36 +0200 Received: from 199-83-221-11.public.monkeybrains.net ([199.83.221.11]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:25:36 +0200 Received: from gnusosa by 199-83-221-11.public.monkeybrains.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:25:36 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jacek Generowicz writes: > Alexis writes: > >> One could, for example, create an entirely new project on GitHub >> called 'MobileOrgRebooted', and create entirely new apps in the >> respective stores using that name. > > That strikes me as the sensible thing to do. > >> (As it is, there's not a uniformly named app in any case - we have >> 'MobileOrg' for iOS, and 'MobileOrg-Android' for, well, Android.) > > There's also MobileOrgNG for Android. There's a difference feature wise between MobileOrgNG[1] and MobileOrg-Android[2], which I believe should be merged into one project. For instance, I don't know of MobileOrgNG having a SSH synchronizer which many people make use of, including me, but with that said, MobileOrgNG has a far greater and friendlier interface. I would suggest merging both projects for the sake of a better user experience. [1] - https://github.com/kvj/mobileorg-android [2] - https://github.com/matburt/mobileorg-android -- Carlos Sosa