From: cesar mena <cesar.mena@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io>,
emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: please read: bug when marking tasks done
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:22:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sz2e3mz.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87zhrlx0zb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> commented repeater cookies does not have any of the above drawbacks.
>> it might require a 3rd party tool to update its re if that tool uses
>> repeaters. this is not unprecedented. the inactive repeater feature
>> might already require a 3rd party tool to update its re.
>>
>> so upon reflection i think i'd go for commentable repeater cookies.
>> it has a bonus too: whenever you turn off a repeater, it can be
>> annoying that it zeroes out the interval. commenting would fix that.
>>
>> perhaps there is a better, unmentioned solution?
>
> I think commented repeaters add unnecessary overhead to the already
> loaded timestamp syntax. This is, IMO, not a common enough need to
> warrant even a minor syntax change.
>
> However, we still need to move forward. So, I suggest to revert the
> change about inactive timestamps. Inactive timestamps cannot be
> repeated. This is less disruptive than the current situation.
yes, agreed.
> However, I also suggest to add a new hook, run after repeating
> timestamps. With this hook, and a proper, user-specific, markup, it
> should be possible to pick inactive timestamps in the section and
> "repeat" them manually, i.e., on a case-by-case basis.
another (maybe crazy) idea is to advise org-auto-repeat-maybe and set
org-repeat-re as needed before it gets called.
regards,
-cm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-30 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-06 0:13 please read: bug when marking tasks done cesar mena
2019-01-06 23:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-07 14:52 ` Bernt Hansen
2019-01-07 15:20 ` cesar mena
2019-01-08 10:24 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-08 14:29 ` Bernt Hansen
2019-01-08 20:07 ` cesar mena
2019-01-09 22:50 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-10 14:15 ` cesar mena
2019-01-12 11:24 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-12 14:23 ` cesar mena
2019-01-12 19:37 ` Samuel Wales
2019-01-12 21:02 ` Samuel Wales
2019-01-13 15:00 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-13 20:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-13 21:52 ` Samuel Wales
2019-01-15 14:24 ` Bernt Hansen
2019-01-15 16:43 ` cesar mena
2019-01-15 23:11 ` Samuel Wales
2019-01-15 23:18 ` Samuel Wales
2019-01-27 21:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-29 14:58 ` Robert Horn
2019-01-30 12:22 ` cesar mena [this message]
2019-01-30 21:52 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2019-01-31 10:25 ` cesar mena
2019-01-31 23:17 ` Samuel Wales
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sz2e3mz.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=cesar.mena@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=orgmode@leo.gaspard.io \
--cc=samologist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).