From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Format of links to Info node and Info index Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 21:29:07 +0100 Message-ID: <878syr7370.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grqIl-0003LH-G9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:29:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grqIe-0002OW-Uc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:29:35 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:41815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grqIc-0002Af-9p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:29:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Michael Brand's message of "Thu, 7 Feb 2019 19:57:05 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Michael Brand Cc: Org Mode Hello, Michael Brand writes: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 11:14 AM Michael Brand > wrote: > >> [...] Now I am confused about >> the difference of info:org#Feedback that is documented as a link to an >> info _node_ in [[info:org#External Links]] but never used in >> org-manual.org versus info:org::Feedback that is not documented in >> org-manual.org but used for all Info links there, like for example in >> the section info:org::Activation for the link to Key Binding >> Conventions. [...] > > Short version: I would just like to know how to fix my Org files. Is > the rule to use info:org::Feedback or info:org#Feedback ? I suggest :: since this is the markup Org uses to separate uri from parameters. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou