From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KHsDBN0+vF85fQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:59:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id WAVsO9w+vF/iKgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:59:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755979402A0 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khKo4-0006t5-N5 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:59:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khKmy-0006sn-52 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:28 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:62763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khKmv-00052D-IW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:27 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29662F161F; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gHTp9kN/209GiHKPBmCo6ZofMPM=; b=fkGW94 wZlM2qGNL6rCuRetKSBOHRljX+kMAC4pgiO1gJgugtocCat7ULWBgjPmH4BiyB64 Qa/orKUPga0pU/2FkF5AiHWJTrA9Xkl7UFuzt70bWAZ/2RBxlQb+Id+EtwYSUv6s oNlAG+G2ERG1b4DJc916GZPWemNNGZCiahj6c= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2222DF161D; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=BwDf6fQ9RsXHzMZQSGth1f0Wpgh3Uu/qHSYc6qB8bF4=; b=oj3mbT1qtto0rXGNFCN1R55kNTcUe3v9/ChtQ4lfoJrKRgq1wP59b1cBUWX13hx8oI1x32XycKlyINekTW96r8CbXqxPdwI4esy2T751y4q9wqVuk+TodjihqQvGcPizn0CQxWjblhcSfZCS05w0TTZn/2Fj1G3kh1f2mAEEKdc= Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F39FF1619; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) From: Kyle Meyer To: skaphle@pm.me Subject: Re: Bug: org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift throws error [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /usr/share/emacs/27.1/lisp/org/)] In-Reply-To: <2wYZbUrw599nuDG1iOkNr-TKx97Kz_P8lQtWItDxGy6lmet6WjkchDFBqmobRVspuQC15m0pPY0zzjesCqLhAOQcM42_lF99QWChY1_FdQY=@pm.me> References: <87y2iwzhmx.fsf@kyleam.com> <2wYZbUrw599nuDG1iOkNr-TKx97Kz_P8lQtWItDxGy6lmet6WjkchDFBqmobRVspuQC15m0pPY0zzjesCqLhAOQcM42_lF99QWChY1_FdQY=@pm.me> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:18 -0500 Message-ID: <878sarsmt1.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 61C2A762-2DDF-11EB-83F2-D609E328BF65-24757444!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=173.228.157.53; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=pb-smtp21.pobox.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=fkGW94 w; dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=oj3mbT1q; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: oMIBlyd7w6Ah skaphle@pm.me writes: > Thanks for the reply. I used the version shipped with emacs in the > report, and now I installed org 9.4 from the gnu default repository > via package-list-packages within emacs and the error indeed goes > away. Is that the recommended stable version to use? I suppose it depends largely on the user. For many, the version of Org bundled with Emacs will do, and it's not worth the hassle of installing it from another source. But, if you've hit into a bug that's fixed in the latest release or just always want to keep up with the latest release, then the default ELPA source is a good choice. There's also Org's ELPA archives, if you instead wanted code based off of the maint branch. https://orgmode.org/elpa.html > Should I report bugs against the latest git version only? Reporting a bug against the Org bundled with Emacs is fine. Many times this issue is still around, and a fix is applied to the maint branch and will be included in the next release. But if it turns out that it's already fixed, then there's no other action we take on our end. However, if a reporter is willing to take the time to check the latest release (or even the maint or master branch) or search the mailing list archives, that's of course appreciated and helpful.