From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id mKMBMeJuTWPKNwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:04:02 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id EM++L+JuTWPZbwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:04:02 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C87623307 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okRer-0003Kh-6y for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:04:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okRck-0003IB-26 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:01:51 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:33589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okRci-0001sK-CG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:01:49 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCAC240101 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:01:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1666018906; bh=JR6aDVIKaYVgyauZ4BHfvFhuJH0/4WPfdk0PO7QrU9k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=VFXPv/2QvoNUEzxsfV1ka5lxseK2ovFvsKqpQKIibjzRvUJocDlHwFiZFq3F2fA9G LKbyLTmHBWMDAnyxV83dqZ7f6U47KORP547HMazEeOX+Y4ske2kJq2S27m71uXeZVo wXcNfv0oScmS/dRa7DWBzoekuCtlcA+qaoeA0DqCMVlvyTlwwA5/eePpm9+nrkDi/1 rQvUeLlWh3icxMnyNG1lQO+H0NpKGLIaaO/OuCKZX6Wm2Cmtj3+yCIFeCmYFbFsR7W SgLpcGazFWUMN5l4A0AI8QoSoyFGNCj96eLLR7lAitR1iiWSvnfx4x3JfoiQqXwtHV RlKWajXBMan9Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MrgF52bx9z6tr1; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:01:45 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: Daniel Fleischer , Max Nikulin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Line breaks and brackets in LaTeX export References: <875ygk6a8z.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65vitbz.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87edv6izx4.fsf@localhost> <8735bmelgu.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:01:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <8735bmelgu.fsf@posteo.net> ("Juan Manuel =?utf-8?Q?Mac=C3=AD?= =?utf-8?Q?as=22's?= message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:30:25 +0000") Message-ID: <878rlecx49.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666019042; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=JR6aDVIKaYVgyauZ4BHfvFhuJH0/4WPfdk0PO7QrU9k=; b=IjNoF9+bk/HZLZEcRb5/hU7kqsWrMLJnc0VTZwg2ZaaPWRIiDmECRamTpHHXPZzyKH1Ri2 zebCsBQ2G2iv/bP5IOnSeBzxbgZDi6H55v70soPW1EWiOvqO0VrS9esfgaaiXH0fi4jm3I Y/7b7t/RjTo/boaS26POKAvaF84Aq0HxQUySfkQkKgs/R2oYaf3kXDwBiTWfYzR+Z8stk6 KGxKYsdoyqQKKg3A9HIcvaXNlqwPpbQ6q4VJiV4oYJ5Ve5T6Qt27c9VOF/yecwG2BvHv66 Hu/fFM7zvneVlswCwIVPKwWlvsKl92DrPEwzekHWsoMYHgLvWAXQZBddlrLTWg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666019042; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hwYeeIVDfJznFKIWLm/P1riFy+ZhE68ZLWw7Eszn/6qUHtxkp8Cdm+I/UDjA0bHSQBAOVO JH73XtnDBMqLrf6dYiDN5VAYrEvUFTE01qKYYeg9uidni5ORsdMabOSZ2ZjDoDFLCMYBTr nfLUs8+rbRcDQz6J2VjeVF7fwPLucyp5qcxxjHDWwQq9ujB7dv8R0iV+eZpji88aR8u6Ak w/eCbEMR7xdLKt/uaQbZhtxGZyCgUPUhffIWzPa3EqofmeYH6STpJtwo4n7tMVbVNHbAOw 8c/WiZXeQqg2IFlbpy6omlzBitddmaqYdJ/r+htDjPgSJ7YCD7QtpWXQonFS6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="VFXPv/2Q"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.22 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="VFXPv/2Q"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4C87623307 X-Spam-Score: -5.22 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: XM9P4V4OhedW Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas writes: > So, in the current situation, we can ask ourselves: is > \empty everywhere safe? Everything points to yes. Can we be 100% sure? > ...? I think I've found a case where \empty 'everywhere' can produce unexpected results. I don't know if I'm missing something, because I've never used this package, but taking a couple of random examples from the tabularray documentation, you can see it, compiling the following snippet (by the way, putting \\[0pt] instead of \\\empty the result is correct). Here in both cases the problem is in the last \empty: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tabularray} \begin{document} \section{Normal} \begin{tblr}{lccr} \hline Alpha & Beta & Gamma & Delta \\ \hline Epsilon & Zeta & Eta & Theta \\ \hline Iota & Kappa & Lambda & Mu\\ \hline \end{tblr} \section{With `empty'} \begin{tblr}{lccr} \hline Alpha & Beta & Gamma & Delta \\\empty \hline Epsilon & Zeta & Eta & Theta \\\empty \hline Iota & Kappa & Lambda & Mu\\\empty \hline \end{tblr} \section{Normal} \begin{tblr}[m]{hlines} Alpha & Beta & Gamma \\ Epsilon & Zeta & Eta\\ Iota & Kappa & Lambda\\ \end{tblr} \section{With `empty'} \begin{tblr}[m]{hlines} Alpha & Beta & Gamma \\\empty Epsilon & Zeta & Eta\\\empty Iota & Kappa & Lambda \\\empty \end{tblr}