From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id wPxGJE8xyWSxIQAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:22:39 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id MEpEI08xyWSEiAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:22:39 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1754E49432 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 18:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=qN9X3jWz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1690906959; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=N0I4ElUKiELZhHSPqD4Y2YS7wueATSU1U8F4bDm30Ls=; b=K7xqYAqRENMcbv2NGfnOsUXMf9EvuVeEJgLWrLwAQuV2L96in74kTfncfKSzz7NZ09M8KF pj9E1KvU/5okdPc7v88YehVikoHsIk+pYdkMjcrYP5lA07PX2uFyKOIo8PW5dFJ1bMJX1N +DYl73gHjFj6tn8XFE1wOdbLjh83IoAkUwj36r3RFbMK3bVpoJ9Y/f4rCMHyC2TyHJDuq9 hjuLsRPvXQJsFv/8Z/yIvaSEH1qKCdEfZ+6faeQZ7DXdCz57GdasXi905iEp/3mdPd7zZH D9ZRVM7fretzXCMJhsuhxbXM5OhM4C6lbnA3IGtR/0hlnGFYKmGlp5IAF93O4A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1690906959; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oKmLrztYZEWUpQoEslptPdXHy788cigM5qoMpBGyyO6lB2CLTduLV3m2blsw/ncEtYQB+/ 3JP5tGXo8ZeSB2O+G7e/HnX8fXsVV5H0fQy/4F8wUL9qFgqeqZCABL0bNYDyxtCloUUJAX pYETISY3CE+OLxxWU7+Jkx1z0PrFNIvefgAN/DWpNLjpvlzfMC1C1ofFrylvgAcPXhGZpN p3eTwq0W24mtbJ/ffffr8scSRs+LtKz4gznzqamA7IykJYPXW4n6zxwlKxDjZNhyfY1Jb6 MqN4OZiZ2canp+NYZ6qxNLtTVQcjUo8v7vaEGky/axknmOrXcF5DrO1OgshlQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=qN9X3jWz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQs8G-0007Oh-LT; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:22:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQs8F-0007OY-Qs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:21:59 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQs8C-0006VE-85 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:21:59 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE5D240104 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 18:21:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1690906913; bh=TsQH/kEHq/wRuKOz+JkAFw0YG5dYZwJV/Qh8Capn97o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=qN9X3jWzcmoCnBVe5SRjawXDwQNxYFasMaqVe69QnmQVW/Dip0gdOE5LR14/FrV/1 BI35ev8742atGuXgPiazakMunenvIFuoEN+ksCb6aEgTkVIT2yJvEwS4PJbQvus8vf 5HxayHrJ9FDvHzIOCtLyfTNIJIwdj1xnQ0mPK7qMDm5aNwnCAKdXNe5/dxHCWzGGm/ HkL0UrFR08iPj4njHJD0QhIxXh4jEoAyFPqVolrnr6Usov2HY7f4g630qNVJK9PThv 7X5zEBv6t8tmDNuVjHw/h9Ub+Fn9VMZVOK3WP5IUaeQ+5tR6BCRGAXGpnNv7b3E04s 3y4HbhL0uEOmw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RFgNc4hBcz9s8M; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 18:21:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: "Fraga, Eric" Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list Subject: Re: is LOCATION not a valid property? org-lint complains! In-Reply-To: <873512zrek.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <873512zrek.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 16:22:04 +0000 Message-ID: <878raupwb7.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.99 X-Spam-Score: -6.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1754E49432 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-TUID: Ipp0TJkieQqn "Fraga, Eric" writes: > I don't use org-lint very often but it is indeed an excellent tool when > an org file somehow gets corrupted in some way. I recently had problems > adding a new entry into my "diary" file, the file that has all of my > meetings & appointments [1]. > > I don't know if this is something new or I simply have never used > org-lint on a file that has entries similar to those in my diary file > but, when I do, I get output like this: > > : 52 low Potentially misspelled option "LOCATION". Consider "EXPORT_LOCATION". > > Should I be using EXPORT_LOCATION? If so, why? That is, why does org > mode care what property I define? Seems rather strange, to me, somehow. ox-koma-letter, which you likely use, understands EXPORT_LOCATION property, but not LOCATION. This is indeed false-positive in your case. > I also get quite a few lines like this one: > > : 60 low Potentially malformed timestamp. Recognized: <2021-01-29 Fri 16:00-17:00> > > I have no idea what is malformed about that timestamp. Am I missing > something obvious or very subtle? May you give an example of a timestamp at "60"? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at